NPP’s Judicial Balancing Act: Hypocrisy or Politics in Chief Justice Torkornoo’s Removal?

The current spectacle unfolding from the NPP’s side is nothing short of preposterous and laughable. It’s particularly galling to hear the minority caucus pleading with traditional chiefs and clergy to intervene and dissuade President John Mahama from removing Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo from office, citing frivolous petitions.

This stance starkly contrasts with the minority’s past actions, where they seemed to champion the removal of officials based on petitions, such as the case of Charlotte Osei from the Electoral Commission under President Akufo-Addo’s administration.

The double standard is glaring. When President Akufo-Addo removed Madam Charlotte Osei, the minority didn’t raise similar objections. Instead, they seemed to support the decision.

Similarly, when Annoh Dompreh petitioned then-President Mahama to remove Lauretta Lamptey from CHRAJ, Mahama acted on it, despite Lamptey being an NDC appointee.

The underlying issue here seems to be a selective application of principles. If President Mahama is acting based on the supreme law of the land, as he should, then the minority’s current stance appears disingenuous.

Given the circumstances surrounding her fate, it’s clear that the Chief Justice’s position has become untenable.

In light of this, the call for her removal is not only justified but necessary. The notion that President Mahama should retain her despite some pertinent allegations is unfounded.

The people and institutions involved should prioritize the integrity and independence of the judiciary. #CJMUSTGO