Movement for Change Backs Mahama’s CJ Suspension, Cites Constitution
The Movement for Change has come to the defense of President John Mahama’s decision to suspend Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, asserting that the process adheres strictly to the constitutional framework outlined in Article 146.
According to the movement in a press release, the president’s actions are well-grounded in the constitution, which serves as the bedrock of Ghana’s democracy.
“The President’s action, taken on the advice of the Council of State and following a prima facie determination, adheres to the procedural framework outlined in Article 146,” the Movement for Change stated. The group emphasized that the current proceedings represent a textbook application of due process, highlighting that the Chief Justice has been afforded the opportunity to respond to the allegations, a crucial component of fairness under the law.
The Movement for Change further argued that defending the rule of law necessitates allowing legal procedures to unfold without interference, even when high-ranking officials are involved.
“No one is above the law not the President, not the Speaker of Parliament, nor the Chief Justice,” the group emphasized. “Accountability is the cornerstone of our democracy, and it must apply equally to all, regardless of status oroffice.”
While acknowledging public concerns regarding transparency, the Movement for Change noted that the constitution currently does not mandate open hearings or disclosures in such proceedings.
Consequently, the group has called upon the Constitutional Review Committee to consider reforms that would increase openness in future removal processes for public officials.
As the investigative committee commences its work, the Movement for Change has appealed to the public to remain calm, trust the constitutional process, and resist any attempts to derail the investigation through political agitation or legal misrepresentation.
The group reminded all that Ghana’s democracy depends not only on elections but also on the consistent, fair application of laws to all citizens, including those at the highest levels of government.
In a statement, the Movement for Change urged the investigative committee to conduct its work with fairness and impartiality, warning that politicization of the matter by parties such as the New Patriotic Party and the National Democratic Congress could compromise the credibility of the outcome and undermine Ghana’s democratic principles.